Maritime Sanctions Data

Flag-of-convenience reliance by sanctions program

Data as of 2026-10-21 · source: U.S. Treasury OFAC Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list
Flag-of-convenience reliance varies sharply by sanctions program: 79.2% of the Terror-finance / proliferation-program fleet flies a shell-jurisdiction flag versus 12.5% of the North Korea (DPRK)-program fleet — across 1,515 OFAC-designated vessels with a recorded flag (data as of 2026-10-21).
Sanctions regime (its flag-of-convenience rate)flag-of-convenience vessels% of total
Iran — 66.1% flag of convenience
438 61%
Russia — 41.7% flag of convenience
177 24.7%
Terror-finance / proliferation — 79.2% flag of convenience
76 10.6%
Venezuela — 23.3% flag of convenience
14 1.9%
North Korea (DPRK) — 12.5% flag of convenience
12 1.7%
Cuba — 33.3% flag of convenience
1 0.1%
Other regimes (173 vessels: GLOMAG, ILLICIT-DRUGS-EO14059, LIBYA3) — 0% flag of convenience
0 0%
Total718100%
↓ CSV ↓ JSON (with provenance)

Screen any hull by IMO from code, no key: GET https://arcnautical.com/api/v1/vessels/{imo}/check · API docs

Methodology

Source: U.S. Treasury OFAC Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list. Computed by the same ArcNautical engine behind arcnautical.com/check (commit 70618f2e8). Full scoring detail: methodology.

FAQ

Which sanctions program relies most on flags of convenience?
As of 2026-10-21, the Terror-finance / proliferation-program fleet has the highest flag-of-convenience rate (79.2% of its flagged vessels fly a shell-jurisdiction register), versus 12.5% for the North Korea (DPRK)-program fleet.
How is "flag of convenience" defined?
A registry classified Tier 3 by ArcNautical's jurisdiction-tier model — a flag-of-convenience / tax-haven register (e.g. Panama, Marshall Islands, Liberia) where beneficial-ownership disclosure is deliberately restricted. It is the same definition the ArcNautical vessel dossier and the by-flag dataset use.

Related